Understanding Hindu Nationalism: From History to Contemporary Realities

 
H
i
n
d
u
 
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
s
m
 
R
e
v
i
s
i
t
e
d
 
 
Overview
 
Being familiar with the information (and readings for)
the slides on “
” is
critical
Hindu Nationalism: An Overview
Will start with HOW the many readings for today
relate to lecture
Will then discuss them in the context of set of themes
about rise of Hindu nationalism in India
 
Readings
 
SAHGAL  presents an overview of the rise of Hindu Nationalism
highlighting some themes, particularly gender
TWO articles by PANKAJ MISHRA trace both the HISTORICAL rise of
Hindu Nationalism (focusing on the destruction of the BABRI mosque in
Dec 1992) and its more contemporary manifestations with Modi’s
victory in 2019
Finally, ASHRAF, points out how growing intolerance is harming not only
Muslims but India itself, and its Hindu population
 
THEMES in Hindu Nationalism
 
HISTORY of Hindu nationalism
Differences between Hinduism and Hindutva
History:  Colonialism, the RSS, HMS, Savarkar and the idea of TWO INDIAs
FEAR of Muslims: No Hindtuva without ANTI MUSLIM agenda
Recap:  MARGINALIZATION of Hindu Nationalism under Nehru
RECENT Rise of Hindu Nationalism (1980s to the present)
Role of AYODHYA campaign
Recap: Caste, rise of OBCs and Dalits
Aggressive Hindu Nationalism under Narendra Modi
 
Hindutva and Hinduism
 
HINDUTVA quite different from the ideas and practice of Hinduism (Hindu dharma).
No sect, deity, orthodoxy, or caste
Product of colonial ideas (See Mishra, p. 191) that then inspired upper caste
Hindu nationalists (Pandey references this too)
In 1924, SAVARKAR distinguished HINDUTVA from Hinduism too
RSS builds its ideology on HINDUTVA not HINDUISM, calls itself a cultural not a
religious organization
1994 Supreme Court too says HINDUTVA not religious (Sahgal:20)
But lines ARE blurred.  Hindutva definition 
CREATED 
to 
EXCLUDE
 Muslims (and
Christians) and its 
AIM
 is to create a 
HINDU RASHTRA 
(a Hindu nation)
Golwakar, leader of RSS and great admirer of Hitler, had this
to say:
The foreign races in Hindustan must either adopt the Hindu culture and language, must learn to
respect and hold in reverence Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but those of the glorification
of the Hindu race and culture, i.e. of the Hindu nation and must lose their separate existence to
merge in the Hindu race, or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation,
claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment -- not even citizen's
rights. There is, at least should be, no other course for them to adopt. (Mishra: 193)
 
Creating a Fear of Muslims
 
Hindutva PREMISED on creating a fear of a Muslim minority, 
whether
that fear is the idea of rising Muslim demographic, of Muslim
terrorism, or “appeasement” of minorities
WITHOUT stoking that fear, there is NO BASIS for Hindu Nationalism
(i.e. making Hindus speaking different languages, with different
cultures, divided by class, caste and gender, feel they are “one
people”)
“They hope to unite Hindu society by constantly invoking such real and
imagined threats as are posed by the evangelical Christians and militant
Muslims” (Mishra: 196-97)
“VD Savarkar made hatred of Muslims central to this philosophy, but Hindus
also had to emulate their strength”  (Sahgal: 20)
 
The RSS
 
Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (National Volunteers Corps)
Created in 1925, to promote Hindu unity and create a Hindu Rashtra
Cadre based, from local neighborhood committees to national organization
Calls itself a “cultural” organization.  Never contested elections
At the center of a “family” of organizations including political party (formerly
BJS, now BJP) a women’s organization, labor, student, religious and youth
organizations
All nominally independent, but run by organizers appointed by the RSS
Defended Hindus and attacked Muslims during partition riots
Banned for a year after implicated in (though legally cleared of) the plot to
assassinate Mahatma Gandhi in January 1948
 
Marginalization: 1950s-mid 80s
 
The JANA SANGH (BJS) had little electoral success. The INC won every national
election from 1951-52 to 1977
INC had its own Hindu traditionalists, who were anti Nehru but WITHIN the
party (reference PANDEY essay)
The BJS won only 3 of 499 Parliamentary seats in 52; 4 of 505 in 1957; 14 of 508
in 1962; 35 of 523 in 1967 (after Nehru’s death) and; 21 of  521 in 1971 (after a
split in the INC)
For the 1977 elections, many parties dissolved their original identities to form
the JANATA party, the BJS among them.  The Janata Party (that included former
BJS) won 295 of 544 seats in Parliament
Post Janata, RSS helped to recreate a political affiliate, now called the Bharatiya
Janata Party (BJP) but won only 2 of 543 seats in the national elections of 1984
 
 
 
Revival: 1980s to the Present
 
BJP seats rose from 2 to 85/543 in the elections of 1989, and then 120 of 543 in
1991
Short lived Government in 1996 when won 161 of 543 seats
Made possible by the AYODHYA movement, and the destruction of the Babri
Mosque in December 1992 (see “Hindu Nationalism: An Overview” and “Two
Themes in Indian Politics” for details, plus of course Mishra’s essay)
The Ramjanmabhoomi movement grew into the metanarrative of contemporary Hindutva.
From small beginnings, it became a transnational movement, a massive source of fundraising
and newly awakened martial religiosity. (Sahgal: 24)
Full five-year term in office after 1998 elections with 182/543 seats
Lost to INC under Sonia Gandhi in 2004, 138/543 seats. MANMOHAN SINGH
became Prime Minister.  Seats declined further to 116/543 in 2009 elections
Won handsomely under Modi in 2014, with 282/543 seats and majority increased
further in 2019 with 303/543 seats
 
 
Political Contexts
 
Populist politics and legitimization of sectarian politics
Role of Indira and Rajiv Gandhi  (see earlier powerpoints)
Mr. Gandhi appeared to perfectly embody a pseudo-socialist elite that claimed to
supervise post-colonial India’s attempt to catch up with the modern West but that in
reality single-mindedly pursued its own interests.
 (Mishra, Op. Ed.)
The “Congress System” with power and prestige concentrated in the “high
command”
There seemed no possibility of dialogue with a metropolitan ruling class of such Godlike
aloofness, which had cruelly stranded us in history while itself moving serenely toward
convergence with the prosperous West. This sense of abandonment became more
wounding as India began in the 1990s to embrace global capitalism together with a
quasi-American ethic of individualism amid a colossal population shift from rural to
urban areas. Satellite television and the internet spawned previously inconceivable
fantasies of private wealth and consumption, even as inequality, corruption and
nepotism grew and India’s social hierarchies appeared as entrenched as ever 
(Mishra Op
Ed.)
 
 
Socio-Cultural and Economic Context
 
Caste Mobilization
“Mandir” a direct response to “Mandal”  (See “Two Themes in Indian
Politics” for details)
Economic: Neo Liberalism
India is a grotesquely unequal society. Its constitution, and much political
rhetoric, upholds the notion that all individuals are equal and possess the
same right to education and job opportunities; but the everyday experience
of most Indians testify to appalling violations of this principle. A great
majority of Indians, forced to inhabit the vast gap between a glossy
democratic ideal and a squalid undemocratic reality, have long stored up
deep feelings of injury, weakness, inferiority, degradation, inadequacy and
envy; these stem from defeats or humiliation suffered at the hands of those
of higher status than themselves in a rigid hierarchy
. (Mishra Op Ed)
 
Modi’s India
 
Playing on 
Ressentiment (a psychological state arising from suppressed feelings of envy and
hatred that cannot be acted upon)
He may have failed to create job opportunities for disadvantaged Indians. But he has sanctioned them, with
his own vengeful contempt for English-speaking elites, to raucously talk back to, and shout down, the
already privileged. In lieu of any liberation from injustice, he has emancipated the darkest of emotions; he
has licensed his supporters to explicitly hate a range of people from perfidious Pakistanis and Indian
Muslims to their “anti-national” Indian appeasers (Mishra Op Ed)
Populism (compare with Indira?)
From the beginning, he was careful to present himself to his primary audience of stragglers as one of them:
a self-made individual who had to overcome hurdles thrown in his way by an arrogant and venal elite that
indulged treasonous Muslims while pouring contempt on salt-of-the-earth Hindus like himself. Boasting of
his 56-inch chest, he promised to transform India into an international superpower and to reinsert Hindus
into the grand march of history. (Mishra Op.Ed.)
Modi Centric politics.  Even RSS plays a secondary role
Illiberal:  Contempt for old elites, specially Nehruvian liberals.  No hesitation in dog whistles
about minorities, or expressing support for more explicit statements denigrating Muslims or
threatening violence toward them
Nehru a particular target of attack, Gandhi sporadically “to test the waters” of public opinion
 
 
Social Media
 
Adept at use of social media
With cheap smartphones in the hands of the poorest of Indians…. Mr. Modi is
preternaturally alert to the fact that the smartphone’s screen is pulling
hundreds of millions of Indians, who have barely emerged from illiteracy, into
a wonderland of fantasy and myth.... After decades of Western-educated and
emotionally constricted Indian leaders, Mr. Modi uninhibitedly participates —
whether speaking tearfully of his poverty-stricken past or boasting of his
bromance with Barack Obama — in digital media’s quasi-egalitarian culture of
exhibitionism. (Mishra Op Ed.)
 
Intolerance and Move to Hindu Rashtra
 
Ghar Waps
i:  “return home” of Muslims and Christians “back” to Hindu faith.  Not
a great success says Sahgal.
Love Jihad
: restrict marriages across religious (but even caste) lines (See next
slide set for more details)
Cow Protection:  See readings on “Hindutva in the News” for next week
Citizenship:  Discriminatory “Citizenship Amendment  Act” passed 2019  (again,
see next slide set)
Any criticism represented as acts of an “antinational” “
tukde tukde
 gang” who
want to break India apart
Hinduization of Polity:  No meat on Hindu Religious festivals, although 
only about
20% of Indians are vegetarians
  Also see 
this
 and 
this
 
Paths to the Future?
 
ASHRAF, says criticism of Hindu Nationalism is a
“ ….warning to the Hindus to save their religion from being appropriated for political
purposes. Else they will, with time, learn to hate and kill and devastate India. This has been
Pakistan’s experience. With the genie of radical Islam let out by President Ziaul Haque,
decades of bloodshed and instability followed”
He ends with Fahmida Riaz poem:
Raising the flag of religion,
I guess now you’ll be setting up Hindu Raj?
You too will commence to muddle everything up
You, too, will ravage your beautiful garden.
You, too, will sit and ponder –
I can tell preparations are afoot –
who is truly Hindu, who is not.
I guess you’ll be passing fatwas soon
!
Think of the contrasts with the India of Gandhi and Nehru
Hindu Nationalism as Fascism?  See Sahgal, Sarkar, among others
Is there a reason that scholars who take GENDER seriously are making this comparison most
vocally?
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Delve into the complexities of Hindu Nationalism through an exploration of its historical roots, contemporary manifestations, and the distinction between Hindutva and Hinduism. Explore key themes, readings, and debates surrounding the rise of Hindu Nationalism in India, shedding light on its implications for India's social fabric. Gain insights into the impact of growing intolerance on religious minorities and the broader Indian populace.


Uploaded on Sep 12, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hindu Nationalism Revisited Hindu Nationalism Revisited

  2. Overview Being familiar with the information (and readings for) the slides on Hindu Nationalism: An Overview is critical Will start with HOW the many readings for today relate to lecture Will then discuss them in the context of set of themes about rise of Hindu nationalism in India

  3. Readings SAHGAL presents an overview of the rise of Hindu Nationalism highlighting some themes, particularly gender TWO articles by PANKAJ MISHRA trace both the HISTORICAL rise of Hindu Nationalism (focusing on the destruction of the BABRI mosque in Dec 1992) and its more contemporary manifestations with Modi s victory in 2019 Finally, ASHRAF, points out how growing intolerance is harming not only Muslims but India itself, and its Hindu population

  4. THEMES in Hindu Nationalism HISTORY of Hindu nationalism Differences between Hinduism and Hindutva History: Colonialism, the RSS, HMS, Savarkar and the idea of TWO INDIAs FEAR of Muslims: No Hindtuva without ANTI MUSLIM agenda Recap: MARGINALIZATION of Hindu Nationalism under Nehru RECENT Rise of Hindu Nationalism (1980s to the present) Role of AYODHYA campaign Recap: Caste, rise of OBCs and Dalits Aggressive Hindu Nationalism under Narendra Modi

  5. Hindutva and Hinduism HINDUTVA quite different from the ideas and practice of Hinduism (Hindu dharma). No sect, deity, orthodoxy, or caste Product of colonial ideas (See Mishra, p. 191) that then inspired upper caste Hindu nationalists (Pandey references this too) In 1924, SAVARKAR distinguished HINDUTVA from Hinduism too RSS builds its ideology on HINDUTVA not HINDUISM, calls itself a cultural not a religious organization 1994 Supreme Court too says HINDUTVA not religious (Sahgal:20) But lines ARE blurred. Hindutva definition CREATED to EXCLUDE Muslims (and Christians) and its AIM is to create a HINDU RASHTRA (a Hindu nation) Golwakar, leader of RSS and great admirer of Hitler, had this to say: The foreign races in Hindustan must either adopt the Hindu culture and language, must learn to respect and hold in reverence Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but those of the glorification of the Hindu race and culture, i.e. of the Hindu nation and must lose their separate existence to merge in the Hindu race, or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment -- not even citizen's rights. There is, at least should be, no other course for them to adopt. (Mishra: 193)

  6. Creating a Fear of Muslims Hindutva PREMISED on creating a fear of a Muslim minority, whether that fear is the idea of rising Muslim demographic, of Muslim terrorism, or appeasement of minorities WITHOUT stoking that fear, there is NO BASIS for Hindu Nationalism (i.e. making Hindus speaking different languages, with different cultures, divided by class, caste and gender, feel they are one people ) They hope to unite Hindu society by constantly invoking such real and imagined threats as are posed by the evangelical Christians and militant Muslims (Mishra: 196-97) VD Savarkar made hatred of Muslims central to this philosophy, but Hindus also had to emulate their strength (Sahgal: 20)

  7. The RSS Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (National Volunteers Corps) Created in 1925, to promote Hindu unity and create a Hindu Rashtra Cadre based, from local neighborhood committees to national organization Calls itself a cultural organization. Never contested elections At the center of a family of organizations including political party (formerly BJS, now BJP) a women s organization, labor, student, religious and youth organizations All nominally independent, but run by organizers appointed by the RSS Defended Hindus and attacked Muslims during partition riots Banned for a year after implicated in (though legally cleared of) the plot to assassinate Mahatma Gandhi in January 1948

  8. Marginalization: 1950s-mid 80s The JANA SANGH (BJS) had little electoral success. The INC won every national election from 1951-52 to 1977 INC had its own Hindu traditionalists, who were anti Nehru but WITHIN the party (reference PANDEY essay) The BJS won only 3 of 499 Parliamentary seats in 52; 4 of 505 in 1957; 14 of 508 in 1962; 35 of 523 in 1967 (after Nehru s death) and; 21 of 521 in 1971 (after a split in the INC) For the 1977 elections, many parties dissolved their original identities to form the JANATA party, the BJS among them. The Janata Party (that included former BJS) won 295 of 544 seats in Parliament Post Janata, RSS helped to recreate a political affiliate, now called the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) but won only 2 of 543 seats in the national elections of 1984

  9. Revival: 1980s to the Present BJP seats rose from 2 to 85/543 in the elections of 1989, and then 120 of 543 in 1991 Short lived Government in 1996 when won 161 of 543 seats Made possible by the AYODHYA movement, and the destruction of the Babri Mosque in December 1992 (see Hindu Nationalism: An Overview and Two Themes in Indian Politics for details, plus of course Mishra s essay) The Ramjanmabhoomi movement grew into the metanarrative of contemporary Hindutva. From small beginnings, it became a transnational movement, a massive source of fundraising and newly awakened martial religiosity. (Sahgal: 24) Full five-year term in office after 1998 elections with 182/543 seats Lost to INC under Sonia Gandhi in 2004, 138/543 seats. MANMOHAN SINGH became Prime Minister. Seats declined further to 116/543 in 2009 elections Won handsomely under Modi in 2014, with 282/543 seats and majority increased further in 2019 with 303/543 seats

  10. Political Contexts Populist politics and legitimization of sectarian politics Role of Indira and Rajiv Gandhi (see earlier powerpoints) Mr. Gandhi appeared to perfectly embody a pseudo-socialist elite that claimed to supervise post-colonial India s attempt to catch up with the modern West but that in reality single-mindedly pursued its own interests. (Mishra, Op. Ed.) The Congress System with power and prestige concentrated in the high command There seemed no possibility of dialogue with a metropolitan ruling class of such Godlike aloofness, which had cruelly stranded us in history while itself moving serenely toward convergence with the prosperous West. This sense of abandonment became more wounding as India began in the 1990s to embrace global capitalism together with a quasi-American ethic of individualism amid a colossal population shift from rural to urban areas. Satellite television and the internet spawned previously inconceivable fantasies of private wealth and consumption, even as inequality, corruption and nepotism grew and India s social hierarchies appeared as entrenched as ever (Mishra Op Ed.)

  11. Socio-Cultural and Economic Context Caste Mobilization Mandir a direct response to Mandal (See Two Themes in Indian Politics for details) Economic: Neo Liberalism India is a grotesquely unequal society. Its constitution, and much political rhetoric, upholds the notion that all individuals are equal and possess the same right to education and job opportunities; but the everyday experience of most Indians testify to appalling violations of this principle. A great majority of Indians, forced to inhabit the vast gap between a glossy democratic ideal and a squalid undemocratic reality, have long stored up deep feelings of injury, weakness, inferiority, degradation, inadequacy and envy; these stem from defeats or humiliation suffered at the hands of those of higher status than themselves in a rigid hierarchy. (Mishra Op Ed)

  12. Modis India Playing on Ressentiment (a psychological state arising from suppressed feelings of envy and hatred that cannot be acted upon) He may have failed to create job opportunities for disadvantaged Indians. But he has sanctioned them, with his own vengeful contempt for English-speaking elites, to raucously talk back to, and shout down, the already privileged. In lieu of any liberation from injustice, he has emancipated the darkest of emotions; he has licensed his supporters to explicitly hate a range of people from perfidious Pakistanis and Indian Muslims to their anti-national Indian appeasers (Mishra Op Ed) Populism (compare with Indira?) From the beginning, he was careful to present himself to his primary audience of stragglers as one of them: a self-made individual who had to overcome hurdles thrown in his way by an arrogant and venal elite that indulged treasonous Muslims while pouring contempt on salt-of-the-earth Hindus like himself. Boasting of his 56-inch chest, he promised to transform India into an international superpower and to reinsert Hindus into the grand march of history. (Mishra Op.Ed.) Modi Centric politics. Even RSS plays a secondary role Illiberal: Contempt for old elites, specially Nehruvian liberals. No hesitation in dog whistles about minorities, or expressing support for more explicit statements denigrating Muslims or threatening violence toward them Nehru a particular target of attack, Gandhi sporadically to test the waters of public opinion

  13. Social Media Adept at use of social media With cheap smartphones in the hands of the poorest of Indians . Mr. Modi is preternaturally alert to the fact that the smartphone s screen is pulling hundreds of millions of Indians, who have barely emerged from illiteracy, into a wonderland of fantasy and myth.... After decades of Western-educated and emotionally constricted Indian leaders, Mr. Modi uninhibitedly participates whether speaking tearfully of his poverty-stricken past or boasting of his bromance with Barack Obama in digital media s quasi-egalitarian culture of exhibitionism. (Mishra Op Ed.)

  14. Intolerance and Move to Hindu Rashtra Ghar Wapsi: return home of Muslims and Christians back to Hindu faith. Not a great success says Sahgal. Love Jihad: restrict marriages across religious (but even caste) lines (See next slide set for more details) Cow Protection: See readings on Hindutva in the News for next week Citizenship: Discriminatory Citizenship Amendment Act passed 2019 (again, see next slide set) Any criticism represented as acts of an antinational tukde tukde gang who want to break India apart Hinduization of Polity: No meat on Hindu Religious festivals, although only about 20% of Indians are vegetarians Also see this and this

  15. Paths to the Future? ASHRAF, says criticism of Hindu Nationalism is a .warning to the Hindus to save their religion from being appropriated for political purposes. Else they will, with time, learn to hate and kill and devastate India. This has been Pakistan s experience. With the genie of radical Islam let out by President Ziaul Haque, decades of bloodshed and instability followed He ends with Fahmida Riaz poem: Raising the flag of religion, I guess now you ll be setting up Hindu Raj? You too will commence to muddle everything up You, too, will ravage your beautiful garden. You, too, will sit and ponder I can tell preparations are afoot who is truly Hindu, who is not. I guess you ll be passing fatwas soon! Think of the contrasts with the India of Gandhi and Nehru Hindu Nationalism as Fascism? See Sahgal, Sarkar, among others Is there a reason that scholars who take GENDER seriously are making this comparison most vocally?

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#