Enhancing Professional Dossiers for Academic Success
In this comprehensive resource, discover valuable insights on preparing and presenting effective P&T (Promotion and Tenure) dossiers. Gain practical advice on structuring quarterly edits, incorporating yearly feedback, mentoring strategies, and engaging off-campus mentors. Learn from real feedback received, including positive aspects liked by others and areas for improvement. Explore sections on research achievements, teaching effectiveness, and more to refine your academic dossier for maximum impact.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Preparing P&T dossiers with punch My Dossier Quarterly edits Yearly input/feedback Mentoring committee Off-campus mentors Honest criticism Consistent Numbers had to be right Words had to be clear Was not perfect I will share with you the things that people told me they liked and didn t like about my dossier.
Highlights Summary (pg2) R Manuscripts Proposals/Grants Presentations 90% T Classroom Training Students 10% s Integrate with appointment Give/Take 0%
Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research- Publications
Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research- Publications: Be Clear Good: Identified my role in each manuscript and clearly wrote what I did with manuscripts that were not from my program. Bad: It became long-winded, so one clean sentence was enough.
Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research - Awards
Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research Awards: Identify Impacts Good: Identified my role in each project and clearly wrote numerical impacts & research contributions. Bad: It was a logistical nightmare and it reminded people about the 43 not-funded proposals.
Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research - Presentations Good: Identified each type of presentation and the presenter. Bad: I didn t identify type of conference (international, national, etc.) and then I lost track of student and collaborator presentations.
Teaching: Be a Good Teacher Teaching Mentoring Research Title & Diversity of Personnel in Research Program YEAR
Teaching: Be a Good Teacher Teaching Mentoring Research: Be Clear Good: My favorite part of the dossier was bragging about my students. Bad: It became hard to keep track of the numbers; it was a logistical nightmare.
Teaching: Be a Good Teacher Teaching Classroom Instruction SAIS reports (Student Evaluation) Appendix Peer evaluation Teaching development Best Practices of Teaching Workshop Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Kickoffs
Service: Record institutional, disciplinary, and/or professional service Service Make it integrate your appointment 90% Research Every published manuscript, review 2 manuscripts Never turn down a grant review opportunity 10% Teaching Department committee (GSC) Research & Teaching 3MT competition for graduate students Judge undergraduate research Disciplinary/Professional You already know what is expected in your field
Preparing P&T dossiers with punch My Dossier Quarterly edits Yearly input/feedback Consistent Was not perfect Acknowledgements Mentoring committee Fellow faculty Off-campus faculty Students Contact: Plant Biotech 431 RFryxell@utk.edu
